You can't play
a game well until you know the rules... the
real trick is to know *all* the rules even better than the
state! The following sections will open up your eyes and mind to just exactly
HOW our rights will be enforced... and, there are many
rights... apparently a lot more than people have ever
realized...
Normally, a state asserts the "11th Amendment"
immunity privilege against lawsuits, and walks away from almost every
concievable type of action for violating common sense and people's rights,
thereby continuing the myth that there's really not
much that can be done about the horrors of social injustice, except lobbying,
petitioning, and other types of slow, lame, and tame methods that account for
very little change, if at all...
NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM THE *REAL* TRUTH OF
WRITTEN FEDERAL LAW!
Here's the gist of the real
truth: States ARE typically immune from suit, but they are expressly
NOT immune from suits involving situations related to incidents involving ANY
program that receives assistance in federal funding!!! (In other words,
virtually everything associated with "family courts", including judges, social
workers, agencies, and the entire processes themselves...)
Below is a large list of federal laws that
specifically WAIVE state immunity whenever there is discrimination on race,
color, religion, age, sex, handicap, national origin, and other forms, and/or
violations of civil and/or constitutional rights, and/or violations against
their own duties under law... and still, there are
even more such "exceptions". The below
is only a sampling...
These laws provide TWO things: (1) they establish a
federal *right*, and (2) they open a door for suit.
The wide-open defintion of what state "programs or
activities" are open to suit is 42 USC 2000d-4a
When state officials, officers, and/or
employees have violated your civil rights, they have committed a
breach of 18
USC 242 (the individual criminal act
against civil rights); If they acted together in any way, then it has become a
breach of 18
USC 241 (the criminal
conspiracy...); Violation of 242 is punishable by up to ONE YEAR in fed
prison, while violation of 241 is punishable by up to TEN YEARS in fed prison...
(i.e., it really IS a *federal
crime* to violate, deprive, or interfere with ANY civil rights, OR any "regular"
rights secured by ANY federal law)
This includes violating not only your more
commonly known "Constitutional Rights", but also the various civil rights and
"regular" statutory rights that are sampled below for you... (AGAIN, there
are MORE of them, and they were meant to
protect you!). See also 28 USC 1652
IMPORTANT TO KNOW!: Since WE are not official
government prosecutors, WE cannot directly file
charges against those wayward government officers ourselves... BUT, under
federal law, we COULD force federal judges to have
them arrested and prosecuted! After anyone violates any of your civil rights
(see 18 USC 241 and
242 above, and this entire page...),
YOU do your duty to report the crime directly to (any) federal
judge, under 18 USC 4, then the federal
statute 42 USC 1987 legally forces the federal judge to ensure
criminal prosecutions. Note: this federal statute has been revised
several times over the years, so to the average layman there would not
readily appear to be any so-called "right" to actually enforce such
prosecution, but click on the "Notes" link to the right of
the main statute body, and see the (last sentence of the) "References in Text",
which confirms that the "Revised Statutes" discussed in the main statute do
INDEED mean guaranteed prosecution for crimes under 18
USC 241 and 242 - i.e., for ALL crimes against
(i.e., ANY deprivations of) our various rights!!!
But, seeking criminal
prosecutions are remedies that are in
addition to the option of personally suing for monetary damages
under any and/or all of the following civil laws (and -
again - there are others...):
42 USC 1983 Civil action for deprivation of rights
(the typical "1983" action comes from this statute)
42 USC 1986 Action for neglect to prevent (i.e., to
prevent interference with civil rights)
42 USC 2000b-2 Personal suits for relief against discrimination in
public facilities (like state courts!!!)
42 USC 2000d Prohibition against exclusion from participation in,
denial of benefits of, and discrimination under federally assisted programs on
ground of race, color, or national origin (NOTE: the US Supreme
Court has added "sex" [gender] to the list of discrimination types this law
prohibits... NOTE: "federally assisted programs" are all over the
place within every state's systems, with matching funds being
paid to the states for all kinds of things for
courts, prosecutors, and virtually all state agencies!!! Get the
picture? Legally, they're ALL on the hook!)
42 USC 2000d-7 Civil rights remedies equalization this
is what is quoted at top... NOTICE the "all-encompassing" part that says:
"or the provisions of any other Federal statute prohibiting discrimination
by recipients of Federal financial assistance."
plus - ANY and ALL
rights existing just under federal law (US Code), including, but
not limited to just the various rights sampled
for you below (again, and again - there's a LOT more...!), regarding
your rightful treatment by, and lawful behavior by, a state court,
virtually ANY state agency, CPS and other forms of
caseworkers/socialworkers, prosecutors, and just about every other state
employee of the types that we don't especially care for...
All that is required is to determine
which TWO federal statutes apply to particular situations (our
arguments) - the statute(s) that provide federal funding for the questioned
"program or activity", and the related statute that prohibits discrimination in
that "progam or activity"...
Part of our complaints are "global"
actions for, essentially, instant removal of all
state family court cases to the jurisdiction of federal courts (based on
the numerous common civil rights violations), under 28 USC §§ 1441 and 1443, while another large
part of our complaints are our solid constitutional arguments regarding all "fit"
parents' natural, and equal, fundamental rights to the "care, custody, and
management" of their children.
Here are some examples of the
various rights that we all have under federal law (US Code) - again, this does
NOT include all of the various Constitutional Rights, which
will also be used, of course:
- Petitioner's Class have inherent federal
question rights, under the guarantees of 42
USC § 2000a, to full and equal lawful
treatment in a state court of law, and according to the various protections
under the U.S. Constitution.
- Petitioner's Class have inherent federal
question rights, under the protections of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 USC § 2000d, et seq., and as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court to
include prohibitions against discrimination based on sex or gender, to
now remove all suspect instant state proceedings, under 28 USC §§ 1441 and 1443, in order to be free from the
denial of such equal civil rights and treatment established by the above
allegations. See also 42 USC § 2000d-7.
- Petitioner's Class have inherent federal
question rights, under the protections of 42 USC §§ 3617 and 3631, which include prohibitions
against discrimination based on sex or gender, to remove all
suspect instant state proceedings, under 28 USC §§ 1441 and 1443, in order to be free from the
denial of such equal civil rights and treatment established by the above
allegations. See also 42 USC § 2000d-7.
- Petitioner's Class have further inherent
federal question rights, under the protections of 42 USC § 5891, which include
prohibitions against discrimination based on sex or gender regarding other
matters and allegations expressed supra, to remove all
suspect instant state proceedings, under 28 USC §§ 1441 and 1443, in order to be free from the
denial of such equal civil rights and treatment established by the above
allegations. See also 42 USC §§ 5106a (Grants to
States for child abuse and neglect prevention and treatment programs),
5106c (Grants to
States for programs relating to investigation and prosecution of child abuse
and neglect cases), 10406 (Discrimination prohibited
in Family Violence Prevention and Services), 10420 (Safe havens for children
pilot program), 10701 (Definitions - regarding
state activity in domestic violence, false imprisonment, and abuse of a
minor), and etc.
- Petitioner's Class have further inherent
federal question rights not to be discriminated as articulated according to
the above allegations, and against the expressed
public policy of the United States of America, by and through certain
Acts of Congress strictly specifying the critical value
of protecting children, youth, and family bonds, and the joint
responsibilities of federal courts therein. See 42 USC §§ 12301, 12351, 12352, 12371, 12635, and etc.
- Petitioner's Class have further inherent
federal question rights to ensure that their minor children are free from
experiencing abuse and/or neglect, due to unlawful sex or gender
discrimination in awards of child custody, and to ensure that any involved
state judicial systems have met or exceeded their
required corresponding duties under 42 USC §§ 13001, 13003, 13021, 13031, and etc.
- Petitioner's Class have further inherent
federal question rights, under 42 USC § 14141, to be free from
unlawful violations of civil rights committed by any parties, government
or otherwise, involved in such state proceedings.
The common result ?
There are many wide-open doors to
sue the states for violating their duties and our rights, and there is
absolutely NO immunity for the states, in ANY way, shape, or
form...