Every aspect of this nationwide initiative has been carefully conceived and planned for years...
The following is just a quick way of providing a glimpse into the plan.
(FROM AN EMAIL, WITH NAMES REDACTED TO PROTECT THE PARTIES' IDENTITIES...)
 
2. Federal or state jurisdiction - well, I guess it is true that this question is not really discussed on the website. The answer is that they will all be filed in federal (US District) courts, per the individual Districts where each principal plaintiff resides (many states have more than one federal District...). Furthermore, I will also update the website to answer this question, obviously asap... Good call for <name redacted> for pointing out this "unknown". (It's known to the existing Coordinators, but obviously to noone else - which must be rectified immediately, of course!!!).
 
3. Complaint not reviewable - again, <name redacted> is technically correct that an already finished complaint is not available for online review. Obviously, the actual complaints themselves *cannot* be completely finished until the individual-per-state principal plaintiffs, each Governor name/address, each AttyGeneral name/address, substitutions of individual State/Commonwealth/Territory/etc names, and similar items, are merged into the model template complaint, to produce the 51-odd-plus separate complaint packages (there are supporting papers/pleadings that go along with each filing, like the Civil Cover Sheets, Civil Appearances, Summonses, Demands for Jury Trials, and etc.). However, and again, the above new webpage explaining a large sampling of the arguments and etc. has now been provided for everyone to rest assured that this initiative is a *most* serious endeavor... more than anyone has probably ever seen come along before... at least since desegregation in the late 50's and early 60's...
 
6. "No way to pre-prepare pleadings" - again, because these are all quickly customized/individualized complaint packages generated from a single model package set (see # 3 above), <name redacted> mistakenly passes judgment before he understands the process... And, again, <name redacted> apparently does not totally comprehend the avenues, possibilities and aspects of federal litigation, especially federal "multi-district" litigation. We fully expect the various states' attorneys general, caught somewhat off-guard by such a nationwide uproar, and not wanting to even possibly take the chance of working against each other in any litigation respect, will immediately jointly file for "multi-district-litigation" jurisdiction, which is an entire panel of (seven, at least four concurring) federal judges over all of the cases combined into one great big case, and which, if (and it will be) ordered so, will be to our preference anyway. Further, any one or more federal judges may move for MDL jurisdiction themselves. Even if none of the state attorneys general or federal judges file for MDL jurisdiction, we already plan to do so ourselves, anyway... because, this is what we want to happen (so that no single judge will be making important decisions on his or her own...), and have already planned on it to be so soon after the original filings...
 
Also, it is VERY important to remember that each individual classaction suit will be designated as a "three-judge" suit.
 
I must take issue with his comment comparing his own little private action as a "real lawsuit", when it can easily be discerned that he has never seriously invested the amount of time, careful planning, and thorough research to fully envision how formidable a genuine "real" lawsuit actually is...