![]() ![]() |
3:57:46am Indiana (Eastern) time. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
UPDATE: 05/11/07 Did you see the new Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)? Common myths, and samples of legal theories & arguments for review Note: this page was created for the STATE classactions, and has not - yet - been updated to reflect information specifically for the newer COUNTY classactions, although some of the information is still relevant. Thanks. If you are a person who has been still hoping for a real opportunity with which to fight back, and prides himself or herself on being able to read, comprehend, and understand the law, then please open your mind, free it from the horrible myths that may have clouded your judgment, and take some time to review the truth for yourself, by examining the samples of hyperlinked federal law and USSC cases that have been provided within the links below. Myth #1: "Pro Se litigants cannot file class actions..." Au contraire, mon ami... If you really believe that, then have a gander at over 100 years of solidly consistent rulings by the United States Supreme Court on such directly explicit and related issues as: the rights of pro se litigants to file class actions under the 1st and 14th Amendments; the unconstitutionality of prohibiting "nonlawyers" from representing others; group standing to assert (litigate) the corresponding rights of its (class) members without the need to have representation by "professional" attorneys; and, the freedom to engage (litigate) in association for the advancement of group (class) beliefs and ideas being an inseparable aspect of the "liberty" assured by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Click here to review live samplings of supporting cases. Myth #2: "The State is immune under the 11th Amendment..." Wrong again! Federal law specifically waives all immunity for the states in many, many instances and situations - with the vast majority of these exceptions, or "waivers", to immunity - occurring under violations of our rights, and/or their duties, associated with the various aspects of family courts. Click here to glean a proper understanding of the numerous rights involved, and the wide-open door that federal law provides us. Myth #3: "The State will be immune to damages anyway..." Sigh... this one is soooo easy to debunk, it's practically pathetic. Take a look here. Myth #4: "You just can't sue for THAT much money... it's unrealistic!" Well... we're not! Apparently, you didn't read deep enough into the homepage information, or have just not yet grasped the entire picture of just what exactly is going on here. That's OK, because we're also not trying too hard to let "the system" fully understand what's coming, either... until the time they are hit with the simultaneous filings. Myth #5: "You can't 'pre-prepare' so many different complaints..." Obviously, there has not been enough perception or understanding into the masterplan. Myth #6: "The constitutional arguments may not be strong enough..." If you can understand how to traceback and defend constitutional law, then read on. Myth #7: "But, there aren't any rights to free attorneys under family law..." Not exactly true (yet)... and, maybe not for all parents, but there most certainly and really is a right for indigent parents. Myth #8: "There aren't any rights to free DNA-testing and attorneys in paternity..." "Whoooo let the dogs out - whoo - whoo - whoo..." All states have known about this right for almost 25 years now... Bet you'll be wanting all of your money back after reading this. Topic #9: "Does this thing involve any arguments about children's rights?" No. In actuality, any so-called "victory" for "childrens rights" could be fatally devastating to the rights of parents, and soon thereafter to the very existence of families in this country. Please read here for more information. Topic #10: "Are there any supporting case laws about criminally prosecuting government officials, even judges, for violating our rights?" Yes. Plenty. You can review more than fifty (50+) examples here. Topic #11: "Please tell me some more about this Multi-District-Litigation (MDL) plan of attack." But, of course. You may learn more about the advantages of MDL jurisdiction, and further details of MDL in regards to our nationwide suits here. Topic #12: "Can you explain the requirements and processes of class-action lawsuits?" Sure. Click on any of the following links for great explanations of the requirements for meeting "certification" for classes, and the processes typically involved: Link 1 | Link 2 | Link 3. An example of a motion to certify class action status in a STATE lawsuit is provided here only for demonstration purposes. Topic #13: "Can you provide some details on the actual class-action complaints and pleadings that will be filed?" Yes. Many of the details are already available here, but keep checking, as more details are being added as time permits. Topic #14: "Can you help me remove my unjust state case into federal court?" Due to overwhelming popular demand, we have provided generic federal removal pleadings packages in Microsoft Word97, Rich Text Format, and WordPerfect 5.x for Windows. The downloads and the important instructions are available here. PLEASE do not ask us to help you individually modify or litigate your own personal cases... We simply do not have the time, and that's why we are concentrating on nationwide class actions - in order to help everyone as soon as possible. Thank you for understanding...
Sorry, this page is always still under construction, adding more information as time permits...
"Education. Litigation. Legislation. Celebration." All Rights Reserved Worldwide Site design by Fast Forward Visual |